Final Decree And Distribution (9 January 1872)
✎
Dates9 Jan 1872
PlacesLauderdale County, Mississippi, USA
Participants8 linked
-
Mary E. Dean Morgan
Heir
Appears in Nathaniel P. Deen estate proceedings by power of attorney; described in record as heir of Thomas Dean, deceased (per estate transcript already ingested).
Sources1 linked
-
Edit source
Attach existing source
DangerRemove this person from event
EVENT #8 — Final Decree and Distribution Date: 9 January 1872 Court: Chancery Court, Lauderdale County, Mississippi Record Type: Final Decree Findings: - Emma E. Russell, widow of Nathan P. Deen, entitled to one-half of estate - Edmond Deen, Garrison Deen, H.J. Deen, Elizabeth Sullivan, Mary E. Morgan, Mary Gilmore, and Mary A. Deen identified as heirs to remaining half Financials (explicit): - Gross proceeds: $1,108.37 - Costs: $116.45 - Taxes paid by Emma E. Russell: $65.95 - Net distributable amount: $925.97 Distributions ordered: - Emma E. Russell: $462.99 plus tax reimbursement - Edmond Deen: $66.14 - H.J. Deen (including for Betsy Sullivan by transfer): $132.28 - Edmond Deen for Garrison Deen: $66.14 - W.G. Grace (as attorney-in-fact for Mary E. Morgan, Mary Gilmore, Mary A. Deen): $198.42 C. NAME & TERM TABLE | original_spelling | normalized_form | confidence | justification | |------------------|-----------------|------------|---------------| | Nathan P. Deen | None | HIGH | Preserved as written | | Emma Ellen Russell | None | HIGH | Preserved as written | | Edmond Deen | None | HIGH | Preserved as written | | Hilliard J. Deen | None | HIGH | Preserved as written | | Garrison Deen | None | HIGH | Preserved as written | | Betsy Sullivan | None | HIGH | Preserved as written | | Mary E. Morgan | None | HIGH | Preserved as written | | Mary Gilmore | None | HIGH | Preserved as written | | Mary A. Deen | None | HIGH | Preserved as written | | W.G. Grace | None | HIGH | Preserved as written | | R.J. Mosely | None | HIGH | Preserved as written | No normalization applied. D. CONFLICTS & FLAGS - Multiple spellings of surnames appear across proceedings. - Transfers of interest noted but not interpreted. E. INTERPRETIVE_NOTES (PHASE-3 ONLY) - Phase-3 may reconcile heir identities, transfers, and representation by power of attorney. - Phase-2 asserts no relationships beyond explicit court findings. F. PHASE-2 COMPLIANCE VERDICT STATUS: APPROVED RATIONALE: - Each filing and decree preserved as a discrete event - Explicit extraction only - All named individuals emitted - No inferred relationships beyond court statements - No normalization PHASE2_HANDOFF: READY
1 source
- Lauderdale County, MS; Chancery Court Minutes; pp. 339-341 (DGS 005842032, pp. 219-220 [of 706]) Free text note Source Ref